aadbc2f647376cd001e51837b3e5dc2c

00:00 → 00:07

00:07 → 00:20

I'm sorry he's telling us because it's probably a position he's taking.

00:20 → 00:24

That means allowing the invasion of Ukraine.

00:24 → 00:33

If we stop, we allow the invasion of Ukraine.

00:33 → 00:40

Now, I'm not so hypocritical as to confuse an invasion with the word peace.

00:40 → 00:45

And so I think that the invasion of Ukraine should not be allowed.

00:45 → 00:50

That doesn't mean that we don't work on a peace plan or that we don't work on a conflict resolution.

00:50 → 00:57

Do you really think anyone enjoys war, do you really think anyone enjoys being in this painting?

00:57 → 01:02

No, but clearly the situation is a little more complicated than some propaganda makes it out to be.

01:02 → 01:04

Because it's about peace, perfect.

01:04 → 01:11

What are the conditions for opening negotiations, in your view?

01:11 → 01:14

Specifically, let's get down to the topic of peace because it's a topic that I'm passionate about.

01:14 → 01:16

I have said it before in this court, and I will say it again.

01:16 → 01:21

I mean, you think, for example, that to open any negotiating table

01:21 → 01:29

The European Union has a duty to help the people of Ukraine.

01:29 → 01:34

Do you think that the conflicts in Ukraine should be reviewed and how?

01:34 → 01:43

Do you think that Moscow should be given the territories it has occupied and on which it has held a referendum on self-determination or not?

01:43 → 01:48

That's what I'd like to hear if we're serious about peace.

01:48 → 01:54

Otherwise, what you're doing is propaganda on the skin of a sovereign nation,

01:54 → 01:57

of a free people and international law.

01:57 → 02:00

And that is irresponsible. Thank you